Curaçao regulator strikes BC.Game licence revocation from register
Summary
The Curaçao Gaming Authority (CGA) has removed from its public register the names of companies previously listed as having their licences revoked, including BC.Game’s holding company Small House B.V. and Rabidi N.V. Both were earlier shown as revoked but are no longer publicly listed under Curaçao’s refreshed register.
BC.Game is currently authorised under an Anjouan licence and there is industry speculation — backed by sources speaking to NEXT.io — that the operator’s bankruptcy might be reversed and that it could seek to regain Curaçao authorisation. NEXT.io has contacted the CGA for clarification on whether the removals signal a return, a reorganisation under new holding companies, or merely an administrative change.
The story sits against a backdrop of wider controversy: BC.Game previously withdrew its Curaçao licence calling the jurisdiction “increasingly hostile”, its related entities have faced questions over corporate registrations in Belize, and there have been ownership disputes and substantial player claims pursued through Curaçao courts. The operator’s ties to Premier League sponsorship also prompted UK political scrutiny and wider concern over white-label arrangements.
Key Points
- The CGA has struck Small House B.V. and Rabidi N.V. from its publicly available register after they were listed as having licences revoked.
- BC.Game remains authorised under an Anjouan licence while speculation circulates about a possible reversal of its Curaçao bankruptcy.
- NEXT.io has asked the CGA whether the removals indicate a return to the register or other administrative changes.
- BC.Game previously withdrew its Curaçao licence and described the jurisdiction as hostile to operators.
- Associated corporate controversies include a non-existent Belize registration for Twocent Technology Limited and an asset transfer from Blockdance to Small House that excluded liabilities, sparking player claims.
- The operator’s Premier League ties elevated the story into UK mainstream political and regulatory scrutiny, with knock-on effects for white-label sponsors.
Why should I read this?
Short answer: because this could be the opening move in BC.Game’s comeback or just bureaucratic shuffling — either way, it affects regulators, players and anyone tracking iGaming risk. If you care about licences, AML scrutiny, sponsorship fallout or who’s legally on the hook for player claims, this is one to skim fast (or read properly if you like drama).
Content summary
The article reports that the Curaçao regulator has removed certain companies from its public register after previously listing them as revoked. It outlines the possibility that BC.Game might seek to restore its Curaçao position amid a potential bankruptcy reversal, summarises earlier withdrawals and controversies around corporate registrations and asset transfers, and notes the broader regulatory and reputational fallout in the UK and European markets.
Context and relevance
This is important to stakeholders in the iGaming and regulatory space because changes to public registers can presage licence reinstatements, restructurings or simply reduced transparency. The story ties into larger trends: increased scrutiny of small-jurisdiction licences (Anjouan, Curaçao), cross-border corporate transparency problems, and the political sensitivity of sponsorships and white-label models. Operators, compliance teams, investors and affiliates should watch for follow-up from the CGA and any legal developments on player claims.
Author style
Punchy: this is not just admin-speak — the removal of names from the CGA register could have real operational, legal and reputational consequences. If you work in regulation, compliance or iGaming deals, dig into the detail; if you don’t, consider this a tidy update saving you time.
