Board Notice to Licensee
Summary
The Nevada Gaming Control Board has issued Notice #2025-77 clarifying that so-called “sports event contracts” — and certain other event-based contracts — are considered wagering under NRS 463.0193 and 463.01962. The Board says this applies regardless of whether the contract is listed on a CFTC-regulated exchange or elsewhere. Examples include outcomes or partial outcomes of sporting events, the World Series of Poker, the Oscars, esports and political elections.
The notice states these offerings may be conducted in Nevada only by entities holding a nonrestricted gaming licence with sports pool approval and meeting other sports wagering requirements (for example wagering accounts and sportsbook systems). The Board warns that offering or partnering on such products outside Nevada without complying with local rules, or violating tribal compacts, may lead to disciplinary action and could call into question a licencee’s suitability under NRS 463.170 and related provisions. The Board will also consider such conduct when assessing new licence applications.
Key Points
- The Board treats “Sports and Other Event Contracts” as wagering under Nevada law (NRS 463.0193; 463.01962).
- This treatment applies whether contracts trade on a CFTC-regulated exchange or elsewhere.
- To offer these contracts in Nevada an entity must hold a nonrestricted gaming licence with sports pool approval and meet sports wagering requirements (accounts, sportsbook systems, etc.).
- Offering or partnering on such contracts in other states without compliance, or breaching tribal compacts, can lead to discipline under NRS 463.720 and NGC Regulation 5.011.
- The Board will consider involvement in unlawful or non-compliant event contracts when evaluating the suitability of licencees and new applications (NRS 463.170).
Context and Relevance
Punchy: This notice is a clear regulatory clamp-down on novel betting products and prediction-market-style contracts. Regulators are increasingly focused on novel derivatives of sports and event outcomes — Nevada’s stance signals that operators and partners must treat these products as traditional wagering for licensing and compliance purposes. For anyone developing prediction markets, platform exchanges or partnering across jurisdictions, this raises licensing, compliance and reputational risks that could affect market access and business relationships.
Why should I read this?
If you work in operations, compliance, product or legal at an operator or exchange — read it. It’s short and to the point: offering or partnering on event-based contracts can jeopardise your Nevada licence and invite discipline. We’ve saved you the time — check this before you launch anything that looks like a prediction or event contract.